Maybe the reason that you did not find a significant correlation is because your sampling was not randomor you did not use sensitive enough equipment. Once writing the discussion section is complete, you can move onto the next stage, wrapping up the paper with a focused conclusion.
The conclusion should not repeat information from the discussion section but restate the main conclusions in a new concise way for your readers, so that they are in no doubt what you have achieved while doing the research presented in your paper.
In addition, the strong correlation between the signal correlation of pairs of neurons generally attributed to common inputand the noise correlation between them generally attributed to direct synaptic connections supports a model of strongly coupled subnetworks that share common input.
You must describe your results, but you must Scientific thesis discussion section interpret them. What type of local connectivity might give rise to these results?
Describe how the data were summarized and analyzed. What is the significance of the present results: People writing a synthesis paper on important new developments in your field. Do not repeat word for word the abstract, introduction or discussion.
Refer to spatial and temporal variations. Simpson and Hays cite more than double-author references by the surname of the first author followed by et al.
Do not interpret the data here. Bonani A high altitude continental paleotemperature record derived from noble gases dissolved in groundwater from the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. Final thesis should be bound. We would like you to gather evidence -- from various sources -- to allow you to make interpretations and judgments.
Giving Credit How does one fairly and accurately indicate who has made what contributions towards the results and interpretations presented in your paper?: Such a model would result in the formation of small subnetworks of highly correlated neurons, partially overlapping in space.
Be sure to include a hook at the beginning of the introduction. A related sequence of actions can be combined into one sentence to improve clarity and readability: Write to try and work out what you think and then re-write it later.
Our main finding consists of highly heterogeneous local populations with relatively large correlations between a minority of neighboring neurons. The list should include a short title for each figure but not the whole caption.
Before you worry about the discussion chapter too much, consider whether you need to treat the discussion as a separate section at all.
Are there any obvious organizational principles in local populations? Relate your findings to the issues you raised in the introduction. Finally, after saying all of this, you can make a statement about whether the experiment has contributed to knowledge in the field, or not.
If you find yourself repeating lots of information about the experimental design when describing the data collection procedure slikely you can combine them and be more concise. The introduction describes why the results needed to be obtained, the methods how they were obtained and the discussion explains the results.
After you have finished the recommendation section, look back at your original introduction. Break up the section into logical segments by using subheads.
The results section is just a presentation of the data. Important negative results should be reported, too. What might make the machine break?Explaining the meaning of the results to the reader is the purpose of the discussion section of a research paper.
There are elements of the discussion that should be included and other things that should be avoided. Always write the discussion for the reader; remember that the focus should be to help the How to Write an Effective Discussion.
Here is some additional advice on particular problems common to new scientific writers. Problem: The Methods section is prone to being wordy or overly detailed. Avoid repeatedly Do not introduce new results in the Discussion.
“Perceptions of the Difficulties of Postgraduate L2 Thesis Students Writing the Discussion Section.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper.
Department of Biology.
What belongs in the "methods" section of a scientific paper? The discussion section should be a brief essay in itself, answering the following questions and caveats: Your thesis is not written in the same order as it is presented in.
The following gives you one idea how to proceed.
The results section is the part of the scientific paper around which everything else is built. The introduction describes why the results needed to be obtained, the methods how they were obtained and the discussion explains the results.
In a conventional thesis, what we call the IMRAD type (introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusion) the discussion chapter appears a discrete chapter. Before you worry about the discussion chapter too much, consider whether you need to treat the discussion as a separate section at all.Download